Florida
International University
Department
of Computer Engineering
EEL
6575
Submitted
by-: Vinay D’Souza & Smitha Gururaj
Student Id #: XXX-XX-3168 & XXX-XX-3750
2.2.1. Ethernet
and IEEE 802.3 Operation
2.2.2. Ethernet
and IEEE 802.3 Service Differences
2.2.3. Ethernet
and IEEE 802.3 Frame Formats
2.3.6. 100BaseT
Autonegotiation Option
3.1. Components
of a Local Area Network
4.3.1. Topology
designed for our network
4.4.1. Specifications
& Features of CISCO 2650 Series Router
4.4.2. Specifications
& Features of 3Com 10/100BT Switch.
4.5. Miscellaneous
Accessories
4.5.3. Servers
and Workstations
5. Migration
from a Fast Ethernet network to a Gigabit Ethernet running at 1000 Mbps
5.1. Gigabit
Ethernet Migration
Upgrading Switch to Server Links
Upgrading Switch-to-Switch Links
Upgrading a Switched Fast Ethernet Backbone
Upgrading a Shared FDDI Backbone
6. Evaluation
and analysis of results
Ethernet LAN systems
To develop a 16-station Ethernet LAN system (100 Mbps system) which should include a file server, printer and a gateway/bridge to connect to similar other networks. Use real components and systems from industry leaders such as Cisco, IBM, Nortel, 3Com and other companies (go to their respective web sites and obtain information). Also show how your LAN can be interfaces to another similar LAN through appropriate network connection (internet or any other network) using real routers.
Describe
in sufficient detail, the function of the components and systems you are using
and provide the cost information. Also show how the LAN can be upgraded to 1
Gigabit systems.
The term Ethernet refers
to the family of local area network (LAN) implementations that includes three
principal categories.
·
Ethernet
and IEEE 802.3: - LAN
specifications that operate at 10 Mbps over coaxial cable.
·
100-Mbps
Ethernet: - A single
LAN specification, also known as Fast Ethernet, that operates at 100 Mbps
over twisted-pair cable.
·
1000-Mbps
Ethernet: - A single
LAN specification, also known as Gigabit Ethernet, that operates at
1000 Mbps (1 Gbps) over fiber and twisted-pair cables.
This chapter provides a high-level overview of each technology variant.
Network managers have always turned to Ethernet and its derivatives as effective solutions for a range of campus implementation requirements. Even though Ethernet networks are difficult to scale one cannot overlook the fact that its underlying transmission scheme continues to be one of the principal means of transporting data for contemporary campus applications.
Ethernet is
a baseband LAN specification invented by Xerox Corporation that operated at
10 Mbps using carrier sense multiple access collision detect (CSMA/CD) to
run over coaxial cable. Ethernet was designed to serve in networks with
sporadic, occasionally heavy traffic requirements, and the IEEE 802.3
specification was developed in 1980 based on the original Ethernet technology.
An Ethernet
network runs CSMA/CD over coaxial cable. [1]

Digital
Equipment Corporation, Intel Corporation, and Xerox Corporation jointly
developed Ethernet Version 2.0, which is compatible with IEEE 802.3. Ethernet
and IEEE 802.3 are usually implemented in either an interface card or in
circuitry on a primary circuit board. Ethernet cabling conventions specify the
use of a transceiver to attach a cable to the physical network medium. The
transceiver performs many of the physical-layer functions, including collision
detection. The transceiver cable connects end stations to a transceiver.
IEEE 802.3
provides for a variety of cabling options, one of which is a specification
referred to as 10Base5. This specification is the closest to Ethernet. The
connecting cable is referred to as an attachment unit interface (AUI), and the
network attachment device is called a media attachment unit (MAU), instead of a
transceiver.
In Ethernet's broadcast-based
environment, all stations see all frames placed on the network. Following any
transmission, each station must examine every frame to determine whether that
station is a destination. Frames identified as intended for a given station are
passed to a higher-layer protocol.
Under the Ethernet CSMA/CD media-access
process, any station on a CSMA/CD LAN can access the network at any time.
Before sending data, CSMA/CD stations listen for traffic on the network. A
station wanting to send data waits until it detects no traffic before it
transmits.
As a
contention-based environment, Ethernet allows any station on the network to
transmit whenever the network is quiet. A collision occurs when two stations
listen for traffic, hear none, and then transmit simultaneously. In this
situation, both transmissions are damaged, and the stations must retransmit at
some later time. Back-off algorithms determine when the colliding stations
should retransmit.
Although Ethernet and IEEE 802.3 are
quite similar in many respects, certain service differences distinguish the two
specifications. Ethernet provides services corresponding to Layers 1 and 2 of
the OSI reference model, and IEEE 802.3 specifies the physical layer (Layer 1) and
the channel-access portion of the link layer (Layer 2). In addition, IEEE 802.3
does not define a logical link-control protocol but does specify several
different physical layers, whereas Ethernet defines only one.
Each IEEE 802.3 physical-layer protocol
has a three-part name that summarizes its characteristics. The components
specified in the naming convention correspond to LAN speed, signaling method,
and physical media type.

IEEE
802.3 components are named according to conventions.
The table given below summarizes the
differences between Ethernet and IEEE 802.3, as well as the differences between
the various IEEE 802.3 physical-layer specifications.
Comparison of Various IEEE 802.3
Physical-Layer Specifications
|
Characteristic
|
Ethernet
Value |
IEEE 802.3
Values |
||||
|
10Base5 |
10Base2 |
10BaseT |
10BaseFL |
100BaseT |
||
|
Data rate
(Mbps) |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
100 |
|
Signaling
method |
Baseband |
Baseband |
Baseband |
Baseband |
Baseband |
Baseband |
|
Maximum
segment length (m) |
500 |
500 |
185 |
100 |
2,000 |
100 |
|
Media |
50-ohm coax
(thick) |
50-ohm coax
(thick) |
50-ohm coax
(thin) |
Unshielded
twisted-pair cable |
Fiber-optic |
Unshielded
twisted-pair cable |
|
Topology |
Bus |
Bus |
Bus |
Star |
Point-to-point |
Bus |
The given figures illustrate the frame
fields associated with both Ethernet and IEEE 802.3 frames.
Various frame fields exist for both
Ethernet and IEEE 802.3.

The Ethernet and IEEE 802.3 frame fields
illustrated in the above figure are as follows.
·
Preamble: -The alternating pattern of ones and zeros tells receiving
stations that a frame is coming (Ethernet or IEEE 802.3). The Ethernet frame
includes an additional byte that is the equivalent of the Start-of-Frame field
specified in the IEEE 802.3 frame.
·
Start-of-Frame
(SOF): -The IEEE 802.3 delimiter byte ends with
two consecutive 1 bits, which serve to synchronize the frame-reception portions
of all stations on the LAN. SOF is explicitly specified in Ethernet.
·
Destination
and Source Addresses:
-The first 3 bytes of
the addresses are specified by the IEEE on a vendor-dependent basis. The last 3
bytes are specified by the Ethernet or IEEE 802.3 vendor. The source address is
always a unicast (single-node) address. The destination address can be unicast,
multicast (group), or broadcast (all nodes).
·
Type
(Ethernet):
-The type specifies
the upper-layer protocol to receive the data after Ethernet processing is
completed.
·
Length
(IEEE 802.3):
-The length indicates the number of bytes of data that follows this field.
·
Data
(Ethernet):
-After physical-layer and link-layer
processing is complete, the data contained in the frame is sent to an
upper-layer protocol, which is identified in the Type field. Although Ethernet
Version 2 does not specify any padding (in contrast to IEEE 802.3), Ethernet
expects at least 46 bytes of data.
·
Data
(IEEE 802.3):
-After physical-layer and link-layer processing is complete, the data is sent
to an upper-layer protocol, which must be defined within the data portion of
the frame, if at all. If data in the frame is insufficient to fill the frame to
its minimum 64-byte size, padding bytes are inserted to ensure at least a
64-byte frame.
·
Frame
Check Sequence (FCS):
-This sequence
contains a 4-byte cyclic redundancy check (CRC) value, which is created by the
sending device and is recalculated by the receiving device to check for damaged
frames.
100-Mbps Ethernet is a high-speed LAN
technology that offers increased bandwidth to desktop users in the wiring
center, as well as to servers and server clusters. The IEEE Higher Speed
Ethernet Study Group was formed to assess the feasibility of running Ethernet
at speeds of 100 Mbps.
The study group divided into two camps
over this access-method disagreement: the Fast Ethernet Alliance and the
100VG-AnyLAN Forum. Each group produced a specification for running Ethernet
(and Token Ring for the latter specification) at higher speeds: 100BaseT and
100VG-AnyLAN, respectively.
100BaseT is the IEEE specification for the
100-Mbps Ethernet implementation over unshielded twisted-pair (UTP) and
shielded twisted-pair (STP) cabling. The Media Access Control (MAC) layer is
compatible with the IEEE 802.3 MAC layer. Grand Junction, now a part of Cisco
Systems Workgroup Business Unit (WBU), developed Fast Ethernet, which was
standardized by the IEEE in the 802.3u specification.
100VG-AnyLAN is an IEEE specification for 100-Mbps
Token Ring and Ethernet implementations over 4-pair UTP. The MAC layer is not
compatible with the IEEE 802.3 MAC layer. 100VG-AnyLAN was developed by
Hewlett-Packard (HP) to support newer time-sensitive applications, such as
multimedia. A version of HP's implementation is standardized in the IEEE 802.12
specification [1].
100BaseT uses the existing IEEE 802.3
CSMA/CD specification. As a result, 100BaseT retains the IEEE 802.3 frame
format, size, and error-detection mechanism. In addition, it supports all
applications and networking software currently running on 802.3 networks.
100BaseT supports dual speeds of 10 and 100 Mbps using 100BaseT fast link
pulses (FLPs). 100BaseT hubs must detect dual speeds much like Token Ring 4/16
hubs, but adapter cards can support 10 Mbps, 100 Mbps, or both.
802.3 MAC and higher-layer protocols
operate over 100BaseT.

100BaseT supports two signaling types:
·
100BaseX
·
4T+
Both signaling
types are interoperable at the station and hub levels. The media-independent
interface (MII), an AUI-like interface, provides interoperability at the
station level. The hub provides interoperability at the hub level.
The
100BaseX-signaling scheme has a convergence sub layer that adapts the
full-duplex continuous signaling mechanism of the FDDI physical medium
dependent (PMD) layer to the half-duplex, start-stop signaling of the Ethernet
MAC sublayer. 100BaseTX's use of the existing FDDI specification has allowed
quick delivery of products to market. 100BaseX is the signaling scheme used in
the 100BaseTX and the 100BaseFX media types.

The 100BaseX convergence sublayer
interfaces two signaling schemes.
The 4T+-signaling scheme uses one pair
of wires for collision detection and the other three pairs to transmit data. It
allows 100BaseT to run over existing Category 3 cabling if all four pairs are
installed to the desktop. 4T+ is the signaling scheme used in the 100BaseT4
media type, and it supports half-duplex operation only [1].

4T+ requires four UTP pairs.
Components used
for a 100BaseT physical connection include the following:
Physical Medium: -This device carries signals between computers and can be one
of three 100BaseT media types:
·
100BaseTX
·
100BaseFX
·
100BaseT4
Medium-Dependent Interface (MDI): -The MDI is a mechanical and
electrical interface between the transmission medium and the physical-layer
device.
Physical-Layer Device (PHY): -The PHY provides either 10-or
100-Mbps operation and can be a set of integrated circuits (or a daughter
board) on an Ethernet port, or an external device supplied with an MII cable
that plugs into an MII port on a 100BaseT device (similar to a 10-Mbps Ethernet
transceiver).
Media-Independent Interface (MII): -The MII is used with a 100-Mbps external transceiver to
connect a 100-Mbps Ethernet device to any of the three media types. The MII has
a 40-pin plug and cable that stretches up to 0.5 meters.
100BaseT requires
several hardware components.

100BaseT and
10BaseT use the same IEEE 802.3 MAC access and collision detection methods, and
they also have the same frame format and length requirements. The main
difference between 100BaseT and 10BaseT (other than the obvious speed
differential) is the network diameter. The 100BaseT maximum network diameter is
205 meters, which is approximately 10 times less than 10-Mbps Ethernet.
Reducing the
100BaseT network diameter is necessary because 100BaseT uses the same
collision-detection mechanism as 10BaseT. With 10BaseT, distance limitations
are defined so that a station knows while transmitting the smallest legal frame
size (64 bytes) that a collision has taken place with another sending station
that is located at the farthest point of the domain.
To achieve the increased throughput of
100BaseT, the size of the collision domain had to shrink. This is because the
propagation speed of the medium has not changed, so a station transmitting 10
times faster must have a maximum distance that is 10 times less. As a result,
any station knows within the first 64 bytes whether a collision has occurred
with any other station.
100BaseT uses
pulses, called FLPs, to check the link integrity between the hub and the
100BaseT device. FLPs are backward-compatible with 10BaseT normal-link pulses
(NLPs). But FLPs contain more information than NLPs and are used in the
autonegotiation process between a hub and a device on a 100BaseT network.
100BaseT
networks support an optional feature, called autonegotiation, that enables a
device and a hub to exchange information (using 100BaseT FLPs) about their
capabilities, thereby creating an optimal communications environment.
Autonegotiaton
supports a number of capabilities, including speed matching for devices that
support both 10-and 100-Mbps operation, full-duplex mode of operation for
devices that support such communications, and an automatic signaling
configuration for 100BaseT4 and 100BaseTX stations.
Three 100BaseT media types exist at
the physical layer.
100BaseT supports three media types at the OSI physical layer
(Layer 1): 100BaseTX, 100BaseFX, and 100BaseT4. The three media types, which
all interface with the IEEE 802.3 MAC layer, are shown in Figure 7-9. Table 7-2 compares key characteristics
of the three 100BaseT media types.

100BaseTX is based on the American
National Standards Institutes (ANSI) Twisted Pair-Physical Medium Dependent
(TP-PMD) specification. The ANSI TP-PMD supports UTP and STP cabling. 100BaseTX
uses the 100BaseX signaling scheme over 2-pair Category 5 UTP or STP.
Characteristics of 100BaseT Media
Types
|
Characteristics |
100BaseTX |
100BaseFX |
100BaseT4 |
|
Cable |
Category 5
UTP, or Type 1 and 2 STP |
62.5/125
micron multi-mode fiber |
Category 3,
4, or 5 UTP |
|
Number of
pairs or strands |
2 pairs |
2 strands |
4 pairs |
|
Connector |
ISO 8877
(RJ-45) connector |
Duplex
SCmedia-interface connector (MIC) ST |
ISO 8877
(RJ-45) connector |
|
Maximum
segment length |
100 meters |
400 meters |
100 meters |
|
Maximum
network diameter |
200 meters |
400 meters |
200 meters |
The IEEE 802.3u specification for 100BaseTX networks allows a maximum of two repeater (hub) networks and a total network diameter of approximately 200 meters. A link segment, which is defined as a point-to-point connection between two Medium Independent Interface (MII) devices, can be up to 100 meters
The 100BaseTX is limited to a link
distance of 100 meters.
100BaseFX is
based on the ANSI TP-PMD X3T9.5 specification for FDDI LANs. 100BaseFX uses the
100BaseX-signaling scheme over two-strand multimode fiber-optic (MMF) cable.
The IEEE 802.3u specification for 100BaseFX networks allows data terminal
equipment (DTE)-to-DTE links of approximately 400 meters, or one repeater
network of approximately 300 meters in length.

The 100BaseFX DTE-to-DTE limit is
400 meters.

The 100BaseT4 supports a maximum
link distance of 100 meters.
100BaseT4 allows
100BaseT to run over existing Category 3 wiring, provided that all four pairs
of cabling are installed to the desktop. 100BaseT4 uses the half-duplex 4T+
signaling scheme. The IEEE 802.3u specification for 100BaseT4 networks allows a
maximum of two repeater (hub) networks and a total network diameter of
approximately 200 meters. A link segment, which is defined as a point-to-point
connection between two MII devices, can be up to 100 meters.

We have researched into all aspects of Ethernet LAN design to design a 100 Mbps – 16 station Ethernet LAN system. We would initially discuss the components available to make the LAN. We would also discuss all the available choices we have while designing the LAN [3].
There are five major components in a Local Area Network:
1.
Network Infrastructure
·
Horizontal
Distribution System
·
Riser
System
·
Backbone
System
2.
Network Hardware
·
Hubs/Concentrators
·
NIC
(network interface cards)
·
Routers/Modems
·
Switches
·
Bridges
3.
Network Operating System (NOS)
·
Novell
·
Windows NT
·
UNIX
4.
Computers and Related Hardware
·
File
Servers
·
Computers
·
Printers/Scanners
·
CD ROM
Towers/Jukeboxes
5.
Application Software
·
Administration
·
Databases/Spreadsheets/Word
Processing
·
Educational
·
Library
·
Other
We would like to mention that here we are just concerned with building a Fast Ethernet Network that has a speed of 100 Mbps, so we would disregard the cost of purchasing the last 3 components i.e. Application software, Network Operating system and Computers & related hardware.
Common
types of computer cable include:
·
UTP
·
STP
·
Coaxial
·
Fiber Optics
The most
popular computer cable currently being installed is UTP, specifically Cat-5.
Since we are going to use horizontal distribution where all the cabling
is going to be within one building, and from the patch panel at the cross
connect to the wall outlet (I/O). (Horizontal does not mean the cable runs are
horizontal, as most runs do have a vertical aspect to them. It means that the
cable runs are confined to that particular building, typically on the same
level.)
UTP cable
has eight solid conductors of 24 AWG copper individually sheathed and twisted
into four pair of two conductors each. Each pair is also individually twisted.
The number of twist per inch varies per manufacturer. The amount of twisting
increases substantially with each increase in Category. For example, the amount
of twists per inch is much greater in Cat-5 than in Cat-3 [2].
The four
pairs inside the UTP cable are color coded. They are twisted separately and
are:
Pair 1 White Blue /
Blue (WB/B)
Pair 2 White Orange /
Orange (WO/O)
Pair 3 White Green /
Green (WG/G)
Pair 4 White Brown /
Brown (WBr/Br)
The actual,
physical length of Cat-5 cable from the I/O to the patch panel is not to
exceed 295 feet. This is the total length of the cable run, including slack.
Allowed
length of the cable [2]

Patch Cords
Use only Cat-5 rated patch cords. According to ANSI specifications, the recommended patch cords maximum lengths are:
At the
cross connect -- 6 meters (19.5 feet)
At the I/O
-- 3 meters (10 feet)
Additional
Cat-5 cable at each end of the horizontal cabling system is recommended. A
suggestion is two to ten feet at the Patch Panel end and one to ten feet at the
I/O end. Be flexible when determining the amount of slack; consider possible
additions, moves, or changes, which may be made in the future.
Advantages of Cat-5 UTP Cable:
·
It
is compatible with most LAN systems
·
It
is widely used, thus parts and cables are readily available
·
The
cost for installation (both labor and material) is low compared with other
cabling systems
Disadvantages of UTP Cable:
·
It
is subject to EMI
·
More
cable is required than is used in coaxial networks
Rules to follow to avoid EMI (Very Important)
·
Stay five inches away from lighting ballast including
fluorescent fixtures (watch the ballast in the fixture). Cross them
perpendicularly.
·
Stay four feet away from electric motors and transformers.
·
Stay one foot away from electric power distribution
conduits.
·
Cross-electrical conduits in a perpendicular pattern.
Cat-5
cable needs to be supported every 4-½ feet when it is installed without
conduit. A system of split rings is what is commonly used.
Under
no circumstances are any cables in the Cat-5 system to be spliced, tapped, or
bridged. All cable runs are home runs from the I/O to the patch panel. The one
exception is the transition point to change to an under carpet cable.
The
bend radius of Cat-5 cable can vary per manufacturer but a safe rule is that no
bends should be less than four times the diameter of the cable.
Cat-5
cable can only be pulled with 25 pounds (lb) of pull. This is to prevent the
stretching of the copper conductors.
When
installing Cat-5 cable do not tighten plastic wraps around cable bundles to a
point where it will pinch the exterior sheathing of the cables.
·
When installing a UTP system in conduit, consider the
following:
·
Do not place UTP cable into any conduit shared with
electrical wires unless there is a physical separation
·
UTP cable can be included in conduit along with low voltage
wires including phone, CATV, and security
·
The conduit should never have more cabling within it than
half the inside diameter of the conduit
Exterior
Cat-5 cable (not PVC or Plenum) is designed to be placed in an underground
conduit that may be exposed to water or subject to freezing. PVC or Plenum
cable should never be run outside of a building, including overhead or
underground runs. If exterior Cat-5 cable is used between buildings it must
have electrical protection on each end as the cable enters each building for
lightning protection. This includes cable installed under a walkway connecting
two buildings.
This
is normally not required on a horizontal cabling system using UTP and having no
exterior cable attached to the rack or backbone cable. If an exterior backbone
cable is terminated at the rack and the cable contains any metal, the cable
needs to be grounded. A good rule of thumb is to always ground freestanding
racks to the main electrical ground [2].
Backbone cables are the cables that connect cross connects together. With in the same building or between buildings. The cables are designed in a star topology.
The following options can be
used for backbone cables:
·
UTP
Cat-5 -- with a maximum
distance of ninety meters (295 feet) between cross connects (CAT-5 is not recommended
by ANSI as a backbone cable).
·
UTP
proposed Level-6 --
with a maximum distance of ninety meters (295 feet) between cross connects ( is
not recommended by ANSI as a backbone cable).
·
STP -- with a maximum distance of ninety
meters (295 feet) between the MCC and ICC.
·
Multi
mode fiber optics --
with a maximum distance of 2000 meters (6560 feet) between buildings and 1500
meters (4920 feet) between the MCC and ICC.
·
Single
mode fiber optics --
with a maximum distance of 3000 meters (9840 feet) between buildings and 2500
meters (8200 feet) between the MCC and ICC.
·
The
numbers of cables used between each cross connect for backbones vary but the
rule we used is for copper cables a minimum of 3. When designing or installing
a fiber backbone a minimum of 6 strands between cross connects within a
building and 12 strands between buildings is the guidelines I recommend.
Hubs will be located in all
cross connects. While this is not a part of the Horizontal Distribution System,
the following information is important to note:
Hubs can be purchased in
either individual or stackable forms.
Individual Hubs -- when
connected together, look as though they are two separate units. These hubs are
less expensive to purchase.
Three possible choices to connect basic
Ethernet hubs
·
Crossover
cable (Port to Port
between hubs)
·
Uplink
port (port in hub to
uplink port in hub)
·
MID/MIDX
Button (when button
is pushed one port becomes a uplink port)
Note: Uplink port means that pins 1&2 receive and 3&6 transmit. The pins are crossed internally so a straight patch cord will work.
Stackable Hubs:
-
When connected together,
look like one single, larger unit. When stackable hubs are connected together,
they are in the same room and usually on the same rack. The manufacturer of the
hubs will have a special cable, which will connect the hubs together. When
designing the networking hardware in a school, it is recommend that all cross
connects which require more than one hubs be stackable if possible.
These hubs have a software
module in them and can be managed from a workstation or remotely. By managed
you can see if the hubs is working, if all the ports are working and check the
traffic [2].
Allows the separation of
LAN’s by segmenting out to smaller LAN’s to reduce the traffic per LAN and
increase performance.
The basic types of computer cable topologies are:
·
Daisy
Chain

·
Bus

·
Ring

·
Star

ANSI EIA/TIA 568-A only recognizes the
star topology. In the star topology, all cables from the cross connect to
the I/O are separate cable runs. The cross connect is the central point where
the I/O cables terminate [2].
If all cabling running within the building
from the I/O to the cross connect is less than 295 feet and there is no
structure in the building which should be avoided, then use the basic star
design. If the building is so large that some cable runs will exceed 295 feet
or for economical reasons, additional cross connects can be added.
Looking at all the requirements that have to achieve, we have 2 options to develop a 100 Mbps Ethernet LAN.
For all practical purposes we
would discuss the differences, the advantages and the disadvantages of both the
above systems. Also it is observed that the 10/100 switched Ethernet is used
only if an existing 10 Mbps LAN is to be upgraded to provide a speed of 100
Mbps to only some workstations. Using the 10/100 switched Ethernet is obviously
the cheaper option of the 2 available choices. The 100VG any LAN has entirely
different setup than the Fast Ethernet LAN and hence we would go ahead and
discuss only Fast Ethernet [4].
We came across various
design issues that had to be addresses while designing a Fast Ethernet LAN
supporting 16 stations with a running speed of 100 Mbps. The most CISCO
design manual for Fast Ethernet Design gave the most viable option for
building such a network. We would initially discuss all the following :-
Fast Ethernet follows the
EIA/TIA Commercial Building Telecommunications Wiring Standard. This
standard defines the types of cable used, the maximum cable distances, and the
way buildings should be wired [3].
Fast Ethernet can run over
the same variety of media as 10BaseT, including UTP, shielded twisted-pair
(STP), and fiber. The Fast Ethernet specification defines separate physical sub
layers for each media type: -
·
100BaseT4
for four pairs of voice- or data-grade Category 3, 4, and 5 UTP wiring
·
100BaseTX
for two pairs of data-grade Category 5 UTP and STP wiring
·
100BaseFX
for two strands of 62.5/125-micron multimode fiber
In most cases, organizations can upgrade to 100BaseT technology without replacing existing wiring. However, for installations with Category 3 UTP wiring in all or part of their locations, four pairs must be available to implement Fast Ethernet
100 BaseT operates at 100Mbps. It uses RJ45 connectors on Category 5 UTP cable.
Category 5 patch cables are required in fast Ethernet networking. Maximum cable
length is 100 meters. Maximum number of devices is 1,024.
100 Base FX uses two strands of
multimode fiber (62.5 µm fiber optic core and 125 µm outer cladding). The
physical level is that of FDDI MMF-PMD (Fiber Distributed Digital Interface
Multimode Fiber - Physical Medium Dependent). The maximum attenuation
allowed per link is 11 dB. The total power loss through the fiber
(including its associated connectors) must not be greater than 11 db as
measured by a fiber optic power meter. The 100 Base FX scheme uses one fiber
for transmission and the other fiber for collision detection and receive.
The Topology that we used is
from the CISCO design manual for design of Fast Ethernets using a Star
topology [3]. Given below a diagram showing how a Fast Ethernet Network may
be connected using routers/switches, repeaters and cables. Again we have the
option to use 100BaseFX (Fiber optic cables) to obtain faster network speeds.
Fast
Ethernet Topology Guidelines [3]

While the
100BaseTX and 100Base T4 specifications maintain the same 100-meter limit from
the wiring closet to the desktop as 10BaseT, 100BaseFX can exceed the 100-meter
limit because it uses fiber instead of UTP. However, 100BaseFX is used
primarily between wiring closets and campus buildings to better leverage its
support for longer cables. Figure 2 shows a typical wiring topology for a
single building.
Just as with 10-Mbps Ethernet, different
wiring types can be connected through a repeater. The 100BaseT standard defines
two classes of repeaters: Class I and Class II.
At most, a
collision domain can include one Class I or two Class II repeaters. Fast
Ethernet is implemented in a star topology, but even with repeaters, the
network diameter is proportionately smaller than 10-Mbps Ethernet, given Fast
Ethernet's tenfold increase in packet speed. For example, using two Class II
repeaters, the maximum distance using copper wire is 100 meters to the Class II
repeater, 5 meters between Class II repeaters, and 100 meters to the desktop.
Based on our
analysis and design done in the OPNET Modeler and Simulator, we have achieved
the following results. The diagram below shows the topology and the design we
have used to connect our network.

We have the choice of using
Routers or Switches to act as a central entity, which connects all the
workstations and the file servers and the printers. Since we still have to
connect our Fast Ethernet LAN network to other LAN networks or to the Internet,
it would be a better if we use a router.
Following
the guidelines laid down by the Cisco manual, we have designed the network in
the following way. We decided to use the 3Com 24 Port 10/100 Switch. Initially
we were tempted to use Cisco 3500 series routers, but decided against it. Since
a Cisco router has to be used in conjunction with a Fast-10/100 switch or a 16
port Cisco hub to allow connectivity to LANs of lower speeds (10 Mbps). Using
just a 3Com 24 port 10/100 Switch instead of the router and the hub solved the
problem and cost much less.
Another
class of Network Designers feels that a Network security would be in
jeopardy if a Router in not used to filter out unwanted traffic. Although
it would be practical to just use a 10/100 Fast Ethernet Switch for connecting
a network of 16 workstations, but it would be wise to use a Router in addition
to a switch so that all the traffic coming from all the other networks are
filtered out before they reach the switch. This way we can also provide much
needed security firewall to the network so that malicious users are not
allowed to hack through the system. This will increase the system cost but
provide a safe and secure network so the user can decide on the Router as an
option. The Router, which we have decided to be used be optionally is the CISCO
2500 series router.
Connected
to the 3Com switch are the 16 workstations, 1 file server and 1 print server.
One of the ports is also connected to the local Internet connection. Any other
LAN network running at 10 mbps or higher can be linked with this switch. The
features of the 3Com 24 ports 10/100 fast Ethernet switch Is given below.
·
Main
Processor: 80 MHz RISC
(Cisco 265x); 50 MHz RISC (Cisco 262x); 40 MHz RISC (Cisco 261x)
·
Flash
Memory: 8 to 16MB
(Cisco 261x and Cisco 262x); 8 to 32MB (Cisco 265x only)
·
System
Memory (DRAM): 32 to
64MB (Cisco 261x and Cisco 262x); 32 to 128MB (Cisco 265x only, uses SDRAM)
·
WAN
Interface Card Slots: 2
·
Network
Module Slot: 1
·
AIM
Slot: 1
·
Console/Aux
Speed: 115.2 Kbps
(maximum)
·
Internet/intranet
access with Firewall security
·
Multiservice
voice/data integration
·
Analog and
digital dial access services
·
Virtual
Private Network (VPN) access
· Inter-VLAN routing
· Routing with Bandwidth Management
·
Total
ports: 24 auto sensing
10/100 Ethernet
·
Media
interfaces:
10/100BASE-TX/RJ-45
·
Ethernet
switching features:
Store-and-forward; full-/half-duplex auto-negotiation; 802.3x flow control
·
Works
"right out of the box" with no configuration and no management
software needed.
·
LED
indicators makes it easy to spot faults and check the status of individual
ports.
·
Automatic
sensing of link speed, duplex mode, and cable type optimizes connectivity.
·
MDI/MDIX
pushbutton simplifies installation and configuration without crossover cables.
·
802.3x
congestion control helps reduce packet loss and improve performance.
We have used the
Farallon Fast Ethernet 10/100 PCI Cards. Each of these cards cost 45.00 $
approximately. Each of these cards will be attached in the workstations and the
print, file server. These PCI cards will give the connectivity to the
workstations and the servers to the 10/100 3Com Switch. These cards have the
ability to perform at 10/100 Mbps. Other features of the card are listed below.
|
|
Fast EtherTX 10/100 PCI Plus |
|
Part Number |
PN996L |
|
System interface |
PCI slot |
|
Protocol compatibility
|
CSMA/CD 802.3 Ethernet |
|
Drivers supported
|
Open FirmWare, Open Transport & NDIS, ODI
Ethernet |
|
Media Interface
|
RJ-45 |
|
N-Way auto-negotiation support
|
100% compliant |
|
Full Duplex |
Yes |
|
Bus addressing
|
32 bit |
|
Peak bus performance
|
132 MBps |
|
Bus mastering
|
Yes |
|
Diagnostic LEDs
|
10Mb mode, 100Mb mode, Link, Activity |
|
Dimensions |
4.68" x 3.19" (11.9 cm x 8.1 cm) |
|
Weight |
4.2 oz (119 gm) |
|
Power requirements
|
5V @ 500mA, |
|
100Base-T cable
|
2-pair Category 5 |
We always have a option of using Repeaters and Hubs. Repeaters are used to connect if the cabling distance increases over 100 meters and we would be using the Fasthub 400 10/100 TX Switched Repeater. Optionally we may have to use an additional hub to connect workstations in a particular floor. We decided to use the repeater FastHub 400 10/100TX Switched Module # WS-X401 in case the distance between any connection increases above 100 meters. This is optional. In case we have 2 or 3 workstations separated on a floor, we can connect them using a 8 port 100Mbps Fast Ethernet Hub Encore Model: 708TX , which is again optional. We have taken into consideration such rare occurrences so that we don’t have any loopholes in our network design
We would be
using a Dell “Power Edge” General Purpose Servers for the File Server
and it would also act as the Print server. Since there are only 16 workstations we would
assume that there are not going to be many print jobs, so that File server can
handle the print jobs as well. We would be using the Dell Precision
Workstations since they were the cheapest options available. The Specifications
of the Servers and workstations are given below.
Dell® PowerEdge™ General Purpose Servers [5]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dell® Precision™ Workstation 220 [5]
|
|
|
Dell Precision Workstation 220
Desktop: |
Pentium® III 866MHz Processor |
|
2nd Processor (must match
speed selection above): |
No Second Processor |
|
Memory: |
128MB PC700 RDRAM® (1 RIMM™) |
|
Keyboard: |
Quietkey® 104-key Keyboard |
|
Monitor: |
17" Dell (16.0" vis) M781P Monitor |
|
Graphics Card: |
nVIDIATNT2 PRO,16MB,4x AGP |
|
1st Hard Drive: |
20GB ATA-66/100 IDE (7200 rpm) |
|
Floppy Drive: |
3.5" 1.44MB Floppy Drive |
|
Operating System: |
Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Professional (Service
Pack 1) |
|
Mouse: |
Logitech® First Mouse™ (2 button w/scroll) |
|
CD ROM and Read-Write Drives: |
20/48X IDE CD-ROM Drive |
We have
done an approximate cost analysis of the network we are trying to build.
Initially we would like to assume a few things. We have not included the cost
of each of the 16 workstations. Since we assumed that the 16 workstations are
already present, but we have included the cost of adding a Fast Ethernet PCI
card to each of the 16 workstations.
Also we have
not taken into consideration the cost of the 2 servers (File server & print
server). Yet we have again included the cost of the PCI Ethernet card for these
2 servers.
Please note
that the cost of an average workstation and a server will be given below in
another table.
|
Item |
Nos. |
Cost |
|
PN996L-TX |
16
– For 16 Workstaions, 2
– For File, Print servers Total
= 18 PCI Cards |
@ 45.00 $ 18 * 45 = 810
$ |
|
Cisco 2650
router |
1
(Optional) |
1700 $ |
|
3Com SuperStack 3 Baseline 10/100 Switch
24-Port |
1 |
845 $ |
|
FastHub 400 10/100TX Switched Module #
WS-X401 |
1
– 3 (Optional Repeaters) |
@
268.65 $ 3
* 268.65 = 806.00 $ |
|
8 port 100Mbps Fast Ethernet Hub Encore
Model: 708TX |
1
– (Optional hub) |
47
$ |
|
Miscellaneous cables ·
Cat5 UTP Cables [6] ·
Multimode Fiber Cables Plenum
Ceramic, with pulling-eye. [6] |
Approximately
8 to 10 – 100 feet UTP cables Approximately
30 Feet to act as a backbone for the network |
@
21 $ 10
* 21 = 210 $ @
120 $/Feet 30 * 120 = 360 $ |
Cost of Workstations and File Servers along with Printers
|
||
|
Dell®
PowerEdge™ General Purpose Servers |
1 Pentium® III Processor, 800 MHz |
1,194.32 $ |
|
Dell® Precision™ Workstation 220 |
16 Pentium® III Processor, 866-1GH MHz |
@ 1,485.99 $ 16 * 1,485.99 $ = 23776.00 $ |
|
Hewlett Packard Laser Jet 4100 TN |
1 |
1560 $ |
|
GRAND TOTAL |
31,308.32
$ (Considering all optional items) |
|
The
initial applications for Gigabit Ethernet will be for campuses or buildings
requiring greater bandwidth between routers, switches, hubs and repeaters, and
servers. In its early phase, Gigabit Ethernet is not expected to be deployed to
the desktop but for all academic and research purposes we will take a look into
that possibility [7].
There
are at least four general upgrade scenarios.
·
Upgrading
switch to server links
to obtain high-speed access to application and file servers
·
Upgrading
switch-to-switch connections
to obtain 1,000 Mbps pipes between 100/1000 switches
·
Upgrading
a switched Fast Ethernet backbone
by aggregating Fast Ethernet switches with a Gigabit Ethernet switch or
repeater
·
Upgrading
a shared FDDI backbone
by connecting FDDI concentrators/hubs or Ethernet-to-FDDI routers with Gigabit
Ethernet switches
In
all the scenarios, at the desktop, the NOS, applications, and NIC drivers would
all remain the same. The MIS manager can also leverage not only his or her
existing multimode fiber but also the current investment in network management
applications and tools.
The simplest upgrade scenario involves
upgrading a Fast Ethernet switch to a Gigabit Ethernet switch to obtain
high-speed 1,000 Mbps interconnection to a server farm of high-performance
super servers with Gigabit Ethernet NICs installed.
![]()
![]()


Another very straightforward upgrade
scenario involves upgrading 100 Mbps links between Fast Ethernet switches or
repeaters to 1,000 Mbps links between 100/1000 Switches. Such high bandwidth
switch-to-switch links would enable the 100/1000 switches to support a greater
number of both switched and shared fast Ethernet segments [7].
![]()

![]()

A Fast Ethernet backbone switch that
aggregates multiple 10/100 switches would be upgraded to a Gigabit Ethernet
switch supporting multiple 100/1000 switches and other devices such as routers
and hubs with Gigabit Ethernet interfaces and uplinks. Gigabit repeaters could
also be installed as needed. Once the backbone is upgraded to a Gigabit
Ethernet Switch, high-performance server farms can be connected directly to the
backbone with Gigabit Ethernet adapter cards increasing throughput to the
severs for users with high-bandwidth applications. Also, the network can now
support a greater number of segments, more bandwidth per segment, and hence
greater number of nodes per segment.
![]()


An FDDI campus or building backbone
would be upgraded by replacing the FDDI concentrator or hub, or
Ethernet-to-FDDI router with a Gigabit Ethernet switch or repeater. (As an
intermediate step, some customers might migrate to an FDDI switch before
installing a Gigabit Ethernet Switch.) The only upgrade required would be the
installation of new Gigabit Ethernet interfaces in the routers or switches or
repeaters. All the investment in fiber optic cable is retained and the
aggregated bandwidth is increased at least tenfold for each segment [7].
![]()

![]()
![]()



We designed our network and simulated
the same in OPNET Network Modeler. We
designed the topology with general systems already predefined in OPNET. Using
similar workstations and servers, and the 3Com 10/100 Fast Ethernet switch we
observed and simulated the network with pseudo load of print jobs and file
jobs. Below are the results of the simulation, which shows the no of jobs on
the Y-axis and the time on the X-axis. The results were quite satisfactory
confirming that the design of the network was done in a correct manner so that
load balancing is achieved.

Results of the Print server
We
tried 3 applications on the servers. The first application is the file request
application and the second application is the print application. Both were performed
in a satisfactory manner. We also tried
the FTP application on the server and the graphs prove that the server managed
the load properly and services each and every node properly.

Results of the File request application

Results of the FTP application on the File server
We have successfully designed a 16
workstation Ethernet LAN running at 100 Mbps. For this we had to use a Fast
Ethernet Design approach. Doing research on all the various Ethernet
technologies have given us a good insight on the options we have in designing
and implementing a Ethernet LAN system. Getting a Ethernet LAN network to run
at 100 Mbps naturally increases the cost of building the network. When we
consider the cost of all the components including the 16 workstations, a
server, printer, and cables, etc. we get a total cost of 31,302.32 $.
The cost of building just the network with the cables, the 3COM 10/100 Fast
Ethernet switch along with the router, Ethernet cards and the optional hubs
would cost us 4778 $. This just goes on to prove that the bare cost of
setting up an optimal working Ethernet LAN running at 100 Mbps is just under 5000/-
$.
We also looked into the aspect of
possible upgrading the Fast Ethernet network to a Gigabit Ethernet Network
running at 1000 Mbps. Upgrading it would require change in lots of the
networking hardware. We have given a typical scenario in which this upgrade can
be done.
[1]
CISCO Systems Inc., Cisco’s Ethernet White Paper, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/ethernet.htm,
2001.
[2]
Edwin Chaplin et Al, LAN Design Engineering, http://www.su-inc.com/lde/index.htm,
August 24th 2000.
[3] CISCO Systems Inc., Technology
Brief: Fast Ethernet 100 Mbps Solutions, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/neso/lnso/lnmnso/feth_tc.htm, July 3rd 2000.
[4] Farallon Inc, Frequently Asked
Questions, http://www.farallon.com/support/fastcards/fenfaq.html, 2000.
[5] DELL Computer Corporation, www.dell.com, 2001.
[6] Price Watch inc., www.pricewatch.com, 2001.
[7] Gigabit Ethernet Alliance, Gigabit
Ethernet Migration, http://www.gigabit-ethernet.org/technology/overview/migration, November 2000.
PLEASE NOTE: - This document is also
available on the net @ http://www.fiu.edu/~vdsouz01/project2.html