![]() |
|
Working Papers |
|
August 2008 |
|
This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on learning by doing. Many of the distinctive theoretical implications of learning by doing have been derived under the assumption that the cost-quantity relationships observed in numerous empirical studies are largely the result of passive learning, and some further require that passive learning is unbounded. The empirical literature raises doubts about both assumptions. When observed cost-quantity relationships indicate sustained productivity growth, factors other than passive learning are generally at work. When passive learning is the dominant factor, productivity growth is invariably bounded. Thus, empirically-relevant theories incorporating learning by doing are hybrid models in which passive learning coexists with other sources of growth. But in such models, many of the distinctive implications of passive learning become unimportant. Moreover, passive learning is often an inessential component of long-run growth; to the contrary, too much learning can lead to stagnation. |
| Prepared for Bronwyn Hall and Nathan Rosenberg (eds.) Handbook of Economics of Technical Change, Elsevier/North-Holland. Forthcoming, 2009. |
|
with Thomas Astebro and Jing Chen This version: August 2008 |
|
In some datasets, the self-employed earn markedly less than wage earners, even though those at the top end of the distribution earn more than their wage-earning peers. This observation is explained by a model of entrepreneurial choice that blends Lazear’s [Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 23, pp. 649-680 (2005)] notion that entrepreneurs must be skilled in a variety of activities with the strong complementarity between skills central to Kremer’s [Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, pp. 551-575 (1993)] O-ring theory of production. We test some predictions of the model using two datasets, with mixed results. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in March 2008. |
|
|
|
This version: May 2008 |
|
This paper presents an explicit model of the entrepreneur’s role in organizing the work undertaken by employees. The model assumes that agents vary in their ability to carry out this task, and so in one sense the model is a special case of Lucas’ [Bell Journal of Economics, 9, pp. 508-523, (1978)] span of control framework. However, the model also relates ability to risk. As in Kihlstrom and Laffont [Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. 719-748 (1979)], the entrepreneur bears all risk. But while Kihlstrom and Laffont assume the entrepreneur bears all risk and show that as a consequence the least risk averse become entrepreneurs, in the present model all agents are risk neutral but entrepreneurs bear all risk as an equilibrium outcome. The model is used to study the consequences of firm growth driven by entrepreneurial learning or by rising demand. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in August 2007. |
|
|
|
with Thomas Astebro This version: May 2008 |
|
Human capital investment theory suggests that entrepreneurs should be generalists, while those who work for others should be specialists; it also predicts higher incomes for entrepreneurs with generalist skills. An alternative view predicts that those with greater taste for variety are more likely to become entrepreneurs and that entrepreneurs will see their incomes decrease with greater skill variety. Data from a survey of 830 independent inventors and 300 individuals from the general population confirm that inventor-entrepreneurs typically have a more varied labor market experience. However, the more varied their experience, the lower their household income. The results support the interpretation that both choice of entrepreneurship and investment in generalist skills are driven by a taste for variety. |
| A widely-circulated earlier version of this paper, entitled "Does it Pay to Be a Jack of All Trades?," was written by Tom alone. After an exchange of ideas, Tom was kind enough to invite me to join him in this revision. The first version of the joint paper was circulated in May 2007. |
|
|
|
with Steven Klepper This version: September 2006 |
|
A growing empirical literature on spinoff formation has begun to reveal some striking regularities about which firms are most likely to spawn spinoffs, when they are most likely to spawn them, and the relationship between the quality of the parent firm and its spinoffs. Deeper investigations into the causes of spinoffs have highlighted the importance of strategic disagreements in driving some employees to resign and found a new venture. Motivated by this literature, we construct a new theory of spinoff formation driven by strategic disagreements, and show how the theory can explain the emerging empirical regularities. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in June 2006. |
|
The Iron and Steel Shipbuilding Data Set, 1825-194: Sources, Coverage, and Coding Decisions |
|
This version: August2008 |
| This article is a supporting document to the paper "Selection and Firm Survival. Evidence from the Shipbuilding Industry, 1825-1914" [Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1):26-36, February 2005], and is not intended for publication. The article provides a basic description of data sources, coverage and limitations, along with coding decisions made for the purposes of statistical analysis. |
|
Working Paper Versions of Recently Published and Forthcoming Papers |
| Articles published since 2005. |
|
|
|
with Mihaela Pintea Review of Industrial organization, forthcoming. |
|
A number of plausible theories offer explanations for the propensity of many young industries to undergo a shakeout phase, during which the number of firms declines sharply in the face of continued rising output. However, none of the theories considers the role of labor market sorting. This paper presents a model in which individual abilities are complements in production, but frictions permit only gradual sorting among firms. The quality distribution of firms becomes wider over time, inducing exit of firms that have ended up with predominantly low-quality workers. The model does not ensure that a shakeout takes place, but when it does it will be characterized by rising output alongside a declining price, an increasing average wage, and a widening of the distributions across firms of employment, output, productivity and average wages. |
| Download the Matlab code used to generate most of the graphs in this paper. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in March 2007. |
|
Desperate Housewives? Communication Difficulties and the Dynamics of Marital (un)Happiness |
|
The Economic Journal, forthcoming. |
|
This paper develops a model of marital dissolution based on communication difficulties. The quality of a marriage depends on the proximity of an action to a target. The target is unknown, and must be learned over time. Each individual receives private signals about the target, and can communicate them only imperfectly to his or her spouse. Because of imperfect communication, spouses may hold different beliefs about the optimal action. The action actually chosen is a compromise of the spouses’ distinct beliefs. If a couple’s beliefs diverge too widely, one or both of them may prefer to dissolve the marriage. The paper explores how poor communication contributes to marital unhappiness, as well as its implications for the dynamics of divorce risk, the welfare properties of divorce decisions, and the role of counseling. When the distribution of decision-making power in the household favors men, wives (but not husbands) can find themselves trapped for prolonged periods in a marriage that leaves them as unhappy as it is possible to be without seeking relief through divorce. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in October 2005. |
|
|
|
with Mihaela Pintea Review of Economic Dynamics, 10(2): April 2007. |
| The last fifty years have witnessed large secular increases in educational attainment and R&D intensity. The fact that these trends have not stimulated more rapid income growth has been a persistent puzzle for growth theorists. We construct a model of endogenous economic growth in which income growth, R&D intensity, and educational attainment depend on the complexity of new technologies. An increase in complexity that makes passive learning more difficult induces increases in R&D and education, alongside a decline in income growth. Our explanation also predicts a concurrent rise in the skill premium. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated as "Economic Growth in a World of Ideas: Some Pleasant Arithmetic" in February 2005. |
|
Management Science, 53(6):908-918 (2007). |
|
This paper produces new estimates of the rate of organizational forgetting in the well-known case study of US wartime ship production. Estimates obtained using data constructed from primary sources at the National Archives yield rates of forgetting that are much smaller than previously reported, and may well be zero. The richness of the data make it possible to control for variations in the product mix, to explore alternative formulations for the learning curve, and to investigate the relationship between organizational forgetting and labor turnover. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in November 2002. |
|
with Steven Klepper Rand Journal of Economics, 34(4):862-888 (2007). |
| We construct a model of industry evolution in which the central force for change is the creation and destruction of submarkets. Firms expand when they are able to exploit new opportunities that arrive in the form of submarkets; they contract and ultimately exit when the submarkets in which they operate are destroyed. This simple framework can transparently explain a wide range of well-known regularities about industry dynamics, most notably the subtle relationships between size, age, growth, and survival. Data on the laser industry, where submarkets are prominent, further illustrate the ability of the model to explain distinctive patterns in the evolution of industries and firms. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in September 2002. |
|
Spinoff Entry in High-Tech Industries: Motives and Consequences |
|
with Steven Klepper Forthcoming in Franco Malerba and Stefano Brusoni (eds.) Perspectives on Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007). |
| Various theories have been advanced for why employees leave incumbent firms to found firms in the same industry, which we call spinoffs. We review the accumulating evidence about spinoffs in various high-tech industries, highlighting the central role often played by disagreements. Because existing theories have ignored them, we develop the foundations of a model of spinoff formation driven by disagreements. Doing so proves to be rather challenging, because disagreements are not possible among rational actors that talk to each other. We introduce a minimal degree of non-rationality, based on the concept of solipsism, and ask whether such a concept is capable of generating predictions consistent with the empirical literature. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in February 2005. |
|
|
|
with Margaret Byrne Medical Decision Making, 26(5):467-479 (2006). |
|
Private information induces individuals to self-select as subjects into clinical research trials, and it induces researchers to select which trials they conduct. We show that selection can induce ex ante therapeutic misconception and ex post disappointment among research subjects; and it undermines it the rationale of collective equipoise as an ethical basis for clinical trials. Selection provides a reason to make non-trivial payments to subjects and it implies that researchers should not design experiments to maximize statistical power. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated in June 2005. |
|
|
|
with Aimee Chin and Chinhui Juhn Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3):572-578 (2006) |
| Using a large, individual-level wage data set, we examine the impact of a major technological innovation — the development of powerful and economical steam engines — on skill demand and the wage structure among the merchant marine. Our data reveal a complex range of responses to the new technology. The new technology created a new demand for skilled workers, the engineers, while destroying other skills relevant only to sail. There were also contradictory effects among the less skilled. On the one hand, technological innovation may have been deskilling for production work since many experienced able-bodied seamen were replaced by laborers in the engine room. On the other hand, able-bodied seamen employed on steam earned a premium relative to their counterparts on sail. Our data allow us to identify this steam premium as a skill premium rather than a compensating differential. At the managerial level, we identify a skill premium on steam for mates, whose job became more complex on the larger vessels, but not for bosuns whose job did not. In aggregate, there is little change traditional measures of the skill premium, but such measures are too crude to illuminate the rich wage dynamics induced by a major technical innovation. |
| This is a much longer version of version of the paper that appeared in the Review of Economics and Statistics. |
|
|
|
Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2):383-389 (2006). |
| I report new evidence for localized knowledge spillovers identified by within-patent variations in the geographic matching rates of citations added by inventors and citations added by examiners. Evaluated at the mean citation lag, inventor citations are 20 percent more likely than examiner citations to match the country of origin of their citing patent, while US inventor citations are 25 percent more likely to match the state or metropolitan area of their citing patent. The localization of intranational knowledge spillovers declines with the passage of time, but international borders present a persistent barrier to spillovers. |
| The first version of this paper was circulated as "Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: What do Patent Examiners Know?" in November 2003. |
|
Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment |
|
with Melanie Fox Kean |
| Jaffe, Trajtenberg and Henderson (Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3):577-98, 1993) developed a matching method to study the geography of knowledge spillovers using patent citations, and found that knowledge spillovers are strongly localized. Their method matches each citing patent to a non-citing patent intended to control for the pre-existing geographic concentration of production. We show how the method of selecting the control group may induce spurious evidence of localized spillovers. This paper reassesses their findings using control patents selected under different criteria. Doing so eliminates evidence of strong intranational localization effects at the state and metropolitan levels, but leaves largely unaffected evidence of international localization effects. |
| This paper was originally circulated in April 2002 under the title "Can Patent Citations Identify Knowledge Spillovers?" |
|
|
|
|
| Several theories of firm performance can explain the well-known observation that survival is positively related to age. However, a more mundane explanation – selection bias driven by variations in firm quality – may also underlie the phenomenon. This paper employs a 90-year plant-level panel data set on the US iron and steel shipbuilding industry of the 19th and early 20th centuries to discriminate between the two explanations. The shipbuilding industry exhibits the usual joint dependency of survival on age and size, but this dependency is eliminated after controlling for heterogeneity by using pre-entry experience as a proxy for firm quality. The evidence points to a dominant role for selection bias in creating the age-dependency of survival. At the same time, pre-entry experience is found to have a large and extremely persistent effect on survival, and this finding is inconsistent with standard explanations for the role of pre-entry experience on firm performance. |
| Earlier versions of this paper, entitled "Surviving in Ships. Firm Capabilities and Survival in the US Iron and Steel Ship-building Industry, 1825-1914", and "Experience and the Survival of Firms. Evidence from the Shipbuilding Industry, 1825-1914" have been in circulation since March 2002. See also the supporting document, "The Iron and Steel Shipbuilding Data Set, 1825-194: Sources, Coverage, and Coding Decisions." |