CHAPTER 3: EVOLUTION OF HUMAN SOCIETIES
Ten thousand years is an enormous amount
of time for the perspective of a single human life span, but it is a very short
time by evolutionary standards. What has caused such rapid and far reaching
change?
The Great Paradox
Despite the changes that have occurred in
human life during the last 10,000 years, the majority of societies changed very
little during their entire existence.
Rapid social and cultural change has been the exception rather than the
rule until recently. In most societies,
life changed very little from one generation to the next, or even from one
century to the next (53).
The parts that fail to change, however,
are eliminated from the system. A
process of selection has been at work in the world system of societies,
favoring larger, more powerful societies at the expense of small, less powerful
ones (54).
Continuity & Change in Individual
Societies
Human societies are essentially adaptive
mechanisms the means of which human populations strive to satisfy their varied
needs and desires. Sometimes this is
accomplished by preserving traditional ways of doing things, and sometimes by
adopting new and innovative ways. In
human societies we find ample evidence of both continuity and change (55).
Social & Cultural Continuity
Change in a society is largely a
cumulative process. This is why
sociocultural systems have grown so much more complex over the course of
history.
There are a number of reasons for the
persistence of social and cultural elements in society.
1.
One major
reason is that in the absence of a clearly better alternative, people will
continue to do what works (55).
2.
Cultural
elements are also preserved if they are perceived by enough people as useful in
answering their individual or personal needs (56).
3.
Sometimes
elements of culture are preserved not because they are superior solutions to
problems but simply because they ensure standardized behavioral responses in
situations where these are essential.
4.
Another
cause of continuity is the cost involved in changing.
5.
The
socialization process is also a force for continuity within societies. Through this process the members of a
society acquire the belief that their culture is a precious resource and worth
preserving.
6.
The effort
to pass culture on to the next generation is reinforced by ideologies that
preserve valued insights of the past (56).
7.
The systemic
nature of human societies is a major force for continuity (57).
Social & Cultural Change
In spite of the forces promoting
continuity, change occurs in society.
Social and cultural change is of 2 basic types. (1) (Innovation) sometimes it involves the
addition of new elements to the existing system and (2) (extinction) sometimes it involves the elimination of
older elements.
Forms of Innovation
Innovation take various forms. Often it takes the form of borrowing from
other societies a process known as diffusion and sometimes it is produced
independently with society. Alterations
are the least important independently produced innovations. These are innovations whose adaptive value
is no greater than that of which they replace.
Discoveries and inventions are more important types of innovations. Discoveries provide the members of a society
with new information that has adaptive value, while inventions are new
combinations of already existing information (58).
Causes of Innovation
Hunger and need.
Chance.
Existing store of relevant information.
Changes in biophysical or social
environments.
Human fecundity.
Because of culture, human needs and
desires seem limitless. Each problem
that is solved and each need that is satisfied seem to generate new needs and
new desires as people take things for granted.
This is the basis of the "revolution of rising expectations” (60).
Variations in the Rate of Innovation
Societies produce innovations at
different rates. There are a number of
reasons for such variations.
One of the most important is the amount
of information a society already possesses.
The addition of each new unit more than doubles the number of possible
combinations (61).
Population size.
Stability and character of social
environment.
Extent of contact with other societies.
Fundamental innovations(65).
A society’s attitude towards innovation
(64).
It is important to note a that
technological innovation occurs at an accelerating pace (64).
Social & Cultural Extinction
Because of social and cultural
innovations, societies are often faced with choices between competing
alternatives, and this leads to a process of selection (64). Although it is the members who make the
choice which shape their society, everyone does not have an equal choice. Who decides depends on the kind of decision
involved and the nature of the power structure involved (65).
Societal Growth & Development
Most societies changed little during the
course of their existence. Moreover,
most changes were insignificant.
Occasionally, however, more significant changes have occurred. These are divided into two groups: (1) Changes in subsistence technology and
(2) the role of ideology in societal growth and development.
Subsistence Technology’s Role in Societal
Growth and Development
Subsistence technology refers to those
elements of society’s store of information that enable it to obtain the energy
its members require and provides the key to understanding societal growth and
development. Advances in subsistence
technology are a necessary precondition for any significant increase in either
the size or complexity of any society. In short, technology defines the limits
of what is possible for a society (67).
Technology also affects the choices that
are made by influencing the costs of various alternatives (68).
Where technological advances have
occurred, they have enabled the members of societies to act as if they had
acquired a new and improved genetic heritage.
Technological advances are functionally equivalent to the important
kinds of changes that occur in the course of biological evolution (68).
Advances in subsistence technology
stimulate advances in other technologies and lead to growth in the size and
complexity of a society (69).
2. Ideology’s
Role in Societal Growth & Development
Whenever its technology presents it with
a range of options, a society’s beliefs an values always come into play. These often have little effect on societal
growth and development. When the
beliefs and values involved are felt to be sufficiently important, however, a
society may reject the most economic solution to its needs in favor of a
solution that is ideologically preferable (69).
Since one of the consequences of
technological advances is that it increases the range of options available to
societies and their members, such advance leads to a greater scope for the
exercise of beliefs and values.
Advanced societies have more choices available to them than societies of
the past and they are freer to apply diverse ideologies in making their
decisions (70).
Change in the World System of Societies
In the latter part of the 20th
century we are witnessing what appears to be the emergence of a single global
culture, as societies around the world increasingly adopt similar culture,
values, and language (70).
1. Societal
Variation and Intersocietal Selection
The key to the major changes that have
occurred in the world system of societies in the last 10,000 years is the
process of intersocietal selection that has drastically reduced the number of
societies.
Not all differences that have developed
among societies have been equally important from the standpoint of
intersocietal selection. Differences
that influenced societal growth and development have been especially important,
because societies that have grown in size and developed in complexity and
military power have been much more likely to survive and transmit their
cultures and institutional patters than societies that have preserved
traditional social and cultural patterns and minimized innovation (71).
Intersocietal selection is not always a
violent process. Sometimes societies
collapse simply because of insufficient support from their members. This is especially likely to occur when a
less developed society comes into that is more highly developed (70=71).
2. A
Model of Evolution of the World System of Societies
Building on what we have learned about
the process of intersocietal selection, we can now construct a model of the
evolutionary process that explains the trends in the world system of societies
in recent millennia (72).
Because technologically advanced
societies have had the advantage, their characteristics have increasingly come
to be characteristics of the world system as a whole.
Sociocultural Evolution Defined
Sociocultural evolution is the process of
change and development in human societies that results from cumulative growth
in their stores of cultural information.
Although sociocultural evolution is an extraordinarily complex
phenomenon, it is easier to understand the process if we recognize the
following:
it includes both continuity and change;
it operates on 2 societal levels: individual and world system
The consequences of sociocultural
evolution have been very different for different human societies: when we look at them individually, we see a
variety of patterns of development.
When we look at the world system, we see it has produced one dominant
pattern for at least 10,000 years.
Excursus: A Comparison of Biological and Sociocultural Evolution
Similarities
During the recent decades, our
understanding of biological evolution and sociocultural evolution has advanced
dramatically. It is now clear for the
first time that both types of evolution are transmitted from generation to
generation in the form of coded systems of information. In the case of biological evolution, the
record of experience is preserved and transmitted by means of the genetic
code. In the case of sociocultural
evolution, the record is preserved and transmitted by means of the genetic
code. In the case of sociocultural
evolution, the record is preserved and transmitted by means of symbol
systems. Both the genetic alphabet and
symbol systems provide population with the means of acquiring, storing,
transmitting, and using enormous amounts of information on which their welfare
and, ultimately, their survival depend.
Thus, symbol systems are functional equivalents of the genetic alphabet.
It is hardly surprising, therefore, that
there is a fundamental similarity in the way the two evolutionary processes
operate. Both processes involve random
variation and selective retention (75).
Differences
1. Because
different species cannot interbreed, they cannot share genetic information with
one another. Thus, biological evolution
is characterized by continued differentiation and diversification, a process
much like the branching of a tree or shrub.
Cultural information, by contrast, is easily exchanged between the
members of different societies. Not
only between the members of different societies. Not only can human societies exchange information, but 2 or more
can merge into a single system—equivalent, were it possible, of the merging of
separate species in biological evolution.
Thus, sociocultural evolution is likely to eventuate in even fewer and
less dissimilar societies than exist today.
2. This
is related to a second important difference.
In biological evolution, the emergence of more complex species has not
had the effect of eliminating, or reducing the number of simpler species. The reverse has occurred in sociocultural
evolution. The emergence of new and
more complex kinds of societies has usually led to the extinction of older,
simpler one.
3. A
third basic difference involves a population’s ability to incorporate into
heritable form from the useful information its members have acquired through
the process of individual learning. In
sociocultural systems, this is easily done.
There is no counterpart, however, in biological evolution (76).
4. Springing
from the easy flow of cultural information among societies, and the ease with
which it is incorporated into heritable form is yet another way in which
sociocultural evolution differs from biological: it has the capacity for much higher rates of change in a species
that has long generation span and relatively few offspring. But cultural information, relative to
genetic, can be rapidly acquired, exchanged, recombined, and accumulated, with
the result that substantial alterations in a society’s culture may occur with a
single generation.
5. Finally,
sociocultural evolution may have a greater potential than biological evolution
for being brought under rational human control (77).