Barring the unexpected, George W. Bush will
be the 10th U.S. president to inherit Fidel Castro as a neighbor. Already
some Cuba analysts predict a hardening of U.S. policy. Yet many in
Congress, notably pro-trade Republicans and liberal Democrats, will no
doubt push for lifting the trade embargo.
Cuba relations should no longer be viewed through a Cold War
prism. Russian President Vladimir Putin's recent visit to Cuba, and his
refusal to criticize America, makes clear that such a view is outmoded.
Nor should the U.S. embargo be wielded as a blunt instrument. The
current cultural, sports, academic exchanges should be promoted. They
expose Cubans to new information and lessen the fear of change. Family
visits do the same, perhaps more powerfully. We believe all travel
restrictions on U.S. citizens should be lifted. Ultimately the goodwill
reaped from such human contact improves the chances for peaceful
transition.
Critics inaccurately assail the U.S. trade embargo as a failure because
the regime remains in place. But by that measure, Canadian and European
``engagement'' also would be considered failures because they haven't led
to human rights or democracy. Worse, by not including required codes of
business conduct, engagement polices have strengthened the regime's
ability to repress. Foreign investors not only don't press for labor
rights, but become partners with the regime in exploiting Cuban
workers.
That's why U.S. trade and investment sanctions should remain. It's also
why Bush should refrain from implementing the extra-territorial provisions
of the Helms-Burton law. Unless waived, Title III would allow
U.S. citizens or companies to sue foreign ventures using confiscated
property in Cuba.
Such provisions have antagonized the European Union to the point that
international complaints about the U.S. embargo drown out condemnations of
Cuba's police state. The best policy is when the United States and allies
press the Cuban regime for change.
BUSH'S CUBA POLICY
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald