The relatives have since been battling to collect on the judgment, and
recently filed notice that they intended to garnishee payments made to
Cuba's phone company by AT&T, MCI and six other U.S. telephone firms.
``Our government is once again stepping in on the side of terrorists,
said Frank Angones, one of the relatives' lawyers. ``We must force Cuba to
accept its guilt, since our government has not seen fit to prosecute.''
In a 17-page ``Statement of Interest, Justice Department lawyers used
an unusual opening argument: The U.S. trade embargo bans any financial
dealings with Cuba, including garnishments, unless specifically licensed
by Washington.
It added that Cuba's ETECSA phone company, a joint venture between the
government and an Italian firm, is an independent firm and therefore
cannot be roped into the relatives' suit against the Cuban government and
its air force.
``The United States condemns the unlawful acts committed by [Cuba] and
sympathizes with the devastating losses experienced by the plaintiffs, it
said. ``Nevertheless, plaintiffs' interests must defer to . . .
law.
But the statement went beyond legalities and into foreign policy,
noting that Havana had vowed that it would cut U.S.-Cuba telephone links
if its share of the income is garnisheed.
``Our position is very simple: If these services are not paid for, then
these services will not continue, Foreign Ministry spokesman Alejandro
Gonzalez repeated Thursday.
``This result would seriously impair the United States' foreign policy
and humanitarian goals with respect to Cuba, the Justice Department
statement said, adding:
``Branches of the government have determined that maintaining direct
telecommunications services toward Cuba is a critical element of our
policy toward Cuba, and in particular of our policy to encourage
development of a civil society independent of the Cuban government and to
promote an eventual peaceful transition to democracy.
The U.S. government, the statement added, ``has a strong humanitarian
interest in enabling family members in both countries to maintain direct
person-to-person contact.
The statement is the second that the Justice Department has filed in
the complicated maneuvering unleashed as the relatives of the Brothers to
the Rescue victims sought to collect on Judge King's $187 million
judgment.
The relatives first went after tens of millions of dollars in Cuban
assets in the United States frozen by the State Department since the
1960s, but ran into opposition from the State and Treasury departments.
They then turned to the money being paid to Cuba by U.S. telephone
firms as Havana's share of the costs of U.S.-Cuba telephone links. That
amounted to an estimated $60 million to $70 million in 1997.
Further complicating the issue was a provision passed by Congress last
year specifically lifting any immunity that might protect the U.S. assets
of foreign nations blamed for terror attacks that kill U.S. citizens.
The provision was designed to help the relatives of victims of the
Brothers to the Rescue downings -- shot down by Cuban MiGs over
international airspace -- as well as the Pan Am Flight 007 downing in
Lockerbie and a terror attack in Israel that killed an American
teenager.
President Clinton signed the bill into law but immediately suspended
its application under a disputed interpretation of its text.
The relatives of the victims involved in all three cases care about
justice and not money, Angones said.
``The only weapon the families have in their hands is to pursue the
Cuban government through its assets, he said. ``It is clearly not what
they want, but for the time being it is a moral sanction.
Herald staff writer David Kidwell contributed to this report.
Feds oppose bid seeking Cuban telephone money
Copyright © 1999 The Miami Herald